ArticleJournal of adolescence2025
Determinants of Rule-Breaking in Adolescence.
Article in Journal of adolescence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionLearning to navigate the many rules that regulate behavior in the adult world is a key developmental goal in adolescence. Yet, adolescents are notorious rule-breakers. In this paper, we use behavioral experiments to examine how adolescent rule-breaking is impacted by situational ambiguity and social influence.
methodsYounger (11-15 year-olds, N = 296) and older adolescents (16-19 year-olds, N = 333) recruited from high schools in the Netherlands (44% male, 54% female, 2% other) completed incentivized tasks. Each task involved a red traffic light, and participants were told that the rule was to wait until it turned green. However, by breaking the rule and crossing before the green light, they could increase their rewards. The tasks varied in two factors: situational ambiguity (a yellow light appearing before green) and peer behavior (observing peers either following or breaking the rule).
resultsAdolescents' rule-breaking is highly sensitive to ambiguity and peer influence. Rule-breaking strongly increases when there is wiggle room to interpret a situation in self-serving ways, and when observing rule-breaking by peers. The magnitude of these effects does not differ between younger and older adolescents, but overall, older adolescents tend to break the rule more often than younger adolescents. Moreover, older adolescents' injunctive norms change more in response to others' behavior. Exploratory analyses indicate that boys break the rule more often and that girls are substantially more sensitive to peer influence than boys.
conclusionsOur experimental results indicate that interventions aimed at curbing adolescents' rule-breaking may benefit from reducing situational ambiguity and promoting exposure to positive peer behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.