ArticleOptics express2025
Experimental comparison of X-ray ptychographic and holographic nanotomography of metal-stained neuronal tissue.
Article in Optics express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synchrotron-based multi-scale biological imaging inside biocontainment environments.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2026Article
- Experimental comparison of X-ray ptychographic and holographic nanotomography of metal-stained neuronal tissue.Optics express · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hard X-ray nanotomography is a promising technology for nondestructive imaging of biological tissues with three-dimensional isotropic resolution. The implementation of fourth-generation synchrotron sources brings coherent X-ray microscopy to the central stage and fosters further development of this class of techniques. Here, we present an experimental comparison of X-ray near-field ptychography and X-ray holography, two high-resolution X-ray microscopy techniques applied under cryogenic conditions to the exact same sample at two different synchrotron sources. Using a heavy-metal-stained, resin-embedded brain tissue sample, we obtain similar contrast and spatial resolutions at equivalent radiation doses with these two approaches. We discuss the current benefits and limitations of the two methods. These results provide a basis for developments in X-ray microscopy of biological samples at present and future beamlines of fourth-generation synchrotron sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.