ArticleHuman genomics2025
Insights into the tripartite relationship between cervical cancer, human papillomavirus, and the vaginal microbiome: a mega-analysis.
Article in Human genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic, transition and variation of cervicovaginal microbiome and HPV infection and cervical dysplasia and cancer: a systematic review.Infectious agents and cancer · 2026Review
- Bidirectional Interactions Between Cervicovaginal Microbiota and Human Papillomavirus Drive Persistence and Disease Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Decoding the microbial landscape of endometrial cancer: a case-control study.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Cervicovaginal Microbiome Signatures Across Cervical Disease States: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most prevalent malignancy among women worldwide, where 99.7% of the cases are linked to persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infections. While emerging evidence suggests a role for vaginal microbiome dysbiosis in HPV-driven CC, the specific microbial alterations and their functional implications remain unclear. However, inconsistencies in identifying specific microbial signatures-largely due to heterogeneous study designs, targeted 16S rRNA regions, and data processing methods-have limited the generalizability of existing findings. To address these challenges, we conducted a standardized mega-analysis using a compositionality-aware approach to ensure consistency and minimize technical bias across studies.
resultsOur mega-analysis consolidates findings from five case-control 16S rRNA ampilicon sequencing studies, encompassing 215 samples. Compared to healthy controls, CC patients exhibited significantly higher alpha diversity (Shannon index, p <0.005) and a shift from a Lactobacillus-dominant to a polymicrobial vaginal microbiome. This microbial dysbiosis was characterized by an increased abundance of Porphyromonadaceae, particularly Porphyromonas asaccharolytica, and other anaerobic bacterial species such as Campylobacter ureolyticus, Peptococcus niger, and Anaerococcus obesiensis (FDR <0.05). Functional profiling of the altered microbiome revealed enrichment in pathways associated with chronic inflammation, fatty acid biosynthesis, amino acid metabolism, cellular proliferation, invasion, and metastasis.
conclusionsThis mega-analysis presents the most methodologically homogeneous study to date of CC-associated vaginal microbiome using publicly available 16S datasets. Our findings not only deepen our understanding of microbial influences on CC but also pave the way for novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches potentially enhancing patient outcomes in CC care. These insights open new avenues for clinical interventions that extend beyond conventional HPV-centric strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.