ArticleHuman resources for health2025
Physician turnover in China, 2011-2021: a nationwide longitudinal study.
Article in Human resources for health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere have been a globally paucity of comprehensive quantitative studies on the physician turnover trends. This study aimed to investigate the trajectory and magnitude of Chinese physician turnover, as well as its influencing factors.
methodsWe established a retrospective cohort by combining annual physician surveillance data and annual medical institution report data between 2011 and 2021. Turnover was defined as physicians who changed their practice institution at least once between 2011 and 2021. We reported the national annual turnover rate, net turnover rate of different regions and types of healthcare institutions. The direction of turnover across provinces and institutions was exhibited using Sankey diagrams. A time-dependent Cox regression analysis was used to examine the factors that influence physician turnover.
resultsThis study included 3.7 million physicians, with 19.4% changing practice institutions between 2011 and 2021. The national annual turnover rate has risen from 1.6% to 4.4%. The majority of turnover occurred within provinces and the same type of healthcare institutions. Eastern regions and urban areas experienced net turnover inflow. Factors that increased the likelihood of physician turnover include: being younger, male, more educated, having senior professional titles, having non-permanent employment contracts, working in rural, non-hospital, or private institutions, and working in institutions with relatively low revenue or high workload.
conclusionsThis study suggests that the physician turnover rate is rising in China. Polices should pay more attention to physician retention in less-developed regions. The underlying causes of physician turnover should be thoroughly investigated. Continuous monitoring of physician turnover is critical to leverage its potential positive impact on revitalizing the healthcare system and to avoid its possible negative impact on equal geographic distribution of physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.