Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40797328›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Factors contributing to the social status of nurses: a qualitative study of key stakeholders' perspectives in Shanghai, China.

Yu Du, Xiao Chen, Yuxia Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yu Du *Department of Nursing, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xiao Chen *Department of Nursing, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yuxia ZhangDepartment of Nursing, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. zhang.yx@aliyun.com.

Funding

Shanghai Philosophy and Social Science Project 2020BGL018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a paucity of data on the factors affecting the subjective social status, which makes it difficult to implement strategies to facilitate the improvement of the social status of nurses.

methodsThis was a descriptive qualitative study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 43 participants, including hospital nursing managers (n = 9), staff nurses (n = 15), doctors (n = 9) and patients (n = 10). Inductive content analysis was used to analyze the data.

resultsAn ecological model was proposed, outlining fourteen elements that were critical to the social status of nurses. The ecological model consisted of 6 domains: (1) individual level, including income and educational level, (2) professional level, including professionalization of nursing and professional autonomy, (3) interpersonal level, including nurse-patient relationship and physician-nurse relationship, (4) organizational level, including organizational management, organizational support and atmosphere, (5) community level, including stereotypes and the nurse-environment misalignment, involvement in the public health emergency, social support, and renewal of health needs, and (6) public policy level, including planning for nursing development and protection of the legal rights of nurses.

conclusionThis qualitative study identified common concerns that may affect the social status of nurses from the perspectives of different stakeholders. The factors contributing to the social status of nurses came from six aspects, including individual level, professional level, interpersonal level, organizational level, community level and public policy level. The findings could help nurse managers have a better overall understanding of the social status of nurses, analyze the current problems, and then take effective measures to improve the social status of nurses.

Indexed as

NurseQualitative studySocial statusStakeholders

Identifiers

PMID40797328
PMCPMC12341354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.