ArticleBMC nursing2025
Effects of interventions on the readiness for hospital discharge in elderly patients with chronic heart failure: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of transitional care program in older adults with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMC geriatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Readiness for Hospital Discharge and 30‑Day Unplanned Readmission in Older Adult Sepsis Survivors from Internal Medicine Wards: A Cross‑Sectional Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Application of Kano model-based pulmonary rehabilitation interventions in discharge preparation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the effects of the interventions on the readiness for hospital discharge in elderly patients with chronic heart failure. The primary outcome was the readiness for hospital discharge. The secondary outcomes were the quality of discharge teaching and the quality of life. The clinical outcomes included the results of the 6-minute walk test and the rate of unplanned readmissions.
designA randomized controlled trial was conducted.
methodsA total of 92 participants admitted with heart failure were recruited from the Department of Cardiology at a tertiary hospital in Qingdao. They were randomly allocated to the control group and the intervention group. All participants received usual care. Participants in the intervention group received discharge preparation interventions. Data were collected at baseline, and at 1 month, 3 months follow-up visits.
resultsCompared to the control group, participants in the intervention group had significantly higher levels of the readiness for hospital discharge (P<0.001) at 1-month and 3-month follow-up (P<0.001). Patients in the intervention group had significantly higher quality of life than those in the control group at 3-month follow-up (P<0.001). Participants in the intervention group got higher scores in the 6-minute walk test than those in the control group at 3-month follow-up (P<0.001). The respective rates of unplanned readmissions in the intervention group were 11.4% and 6.8% at 1-month and 3-month follow-up. The rates for the control group were 37.2% and 32.6% at 1-month and 3-month follow-up, respectively (P = 0.005, P = 0.002).
conclusionDischarge preparation interventions can effectively improve the readiness for hospital discharge, the quality of discharge teaching and the quality of life, as well as reduce the rate of unplanned readmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.