Observational studyBMC oral health2025
Association between weather variables and fascial space infections of the head and neck: a retrospective chart review.
Observational study in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence of fascial space infections of the head and neck has long been suggested to correlate with weather patterns, though objective evidence is inconsistent, and a causative effect is difficult to prove. One issue in the existing literature is that correlations between space infections and weather patterns have been assessed in only a few climates, so data from additional regions is needed. The purpose of this study is to understand whether head and neck infection rates correlate with weather patterns in a humid subtropical climate, adding to the current literature derived largely from temperate environments.
methodsIn this retrospective observational study, we investigate potential associations between weather variables and fascial space infections of the head and neck treated by oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) at Augusta University Medical Center, an urban tertiary care center in the Southeastern United States, over a 7-year period. The study sample included all patients presenting between October 2012 and September 2019 for head and neck infections identified by ICD10 code. Those with pre-existing oral or maxillofacial disease, including recent infection, were excluded. Daily weather reports from this period were obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration online database. The primary outcome variable, "infection rate" was stratified according to the day, month, year, and season of diagnosis. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated for infection rate with each weather variable in each time grouping, with needle plots constructed to visualize trends. Statistical significance was determined with p-value < 0.05.
results199 patients were included. Only when infection rates were stratified by year did Spearman correlations reach statistical significance. Correlations that reached statistical significance included daily departure from normal average temperature, cooling degree days, daily maximum dry bulb temperature, average dry bulb temperature, average wet bulb temperature, and daily minimum dry bulb temperature. Using the null hypothesis that there was no correlation between weather variables and infection rates, all other correlation coefficients failed to reach statistical significance.
conclusionsThe results of this study do not support an association between weather and head and neck fascial space infections in the southeastern United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.