ArticleIsrael journal of health policy research2025
Policy implications of physicians' attitudes towards being examined by medical students.
Article in Israel journal of health policy research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysicians who become patients-especially those involved in teaching-hold a dual perspective that may influence their comfort with medical student involvement in their care. Understanding these attitudes is essential for shaping medical education policies related to consent, patient assignment, and professional boundaries. This study explored Israeli family physicians' willingness to be examined by medical students and examined implications for clinical teaching policy.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among Israeli family physicians during June-July 2024. A total of 149 participants completed a structured questionnaire assessing their comfort with students observing, taking medical histories, and performing physical, intimate, and invasive examinations. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests to compare subgroups by gender, age, and teaching status.
resultsAmong the 149 respondents (mean age 47.2 years; 65.1% female), 92.6% were comfortable with students observing non-intimate exams, but only 29.5% agreed to student presence during intimate exams. Comfort increased slightly if the student was of the same gender (48.3%), but overall acceptance remained low. Female physicians were significantly less willing than males to undergo physical exams by students (63.5% vs. 88.2%; p = 0.006) and were more uncomfortable with male students performing intimate exams (48% vs. 28.1%; p = 0.014). Physicians aged ≤ 45 were less willing to student observation than those aged ≥ 46 (61.0% vs. 42.3%; p = 0.033). Only 16.8% agreed to allow students to perform invasive procedures. Interestingly, teaching physicians were significantly less likely than non-teachers to agree to student presence during intimate exams (29.7% vs. 51.6%; p = 0.018).
conclusionsWhile student involvement in non-invasive care is widely accepted, substantial discomfort persists with intimate and invasive scenarios-particularly among female and teaching physicians. These findings raise ethical and educational concerns. Institutions should consider: (1) Allowing physician-patients to opt out of student involvement without stigma; (2) Implementing real-time, standardized informed consent for all patients, including physicians; (3) Creating clear guidelines on teacher-student dynamics in clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.