ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Evaluation of corneal endothelial parameters in patients with methamphetamine use disorder.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the structure and properties of corneal endothelial cells in patients with methamphetamine use disorder. MATERIAL AND
methodThe cross-sectional study included 33 eyes of 33 patients with methamphetamine (meth) use disorder and 33 eyes of 33 healthy subjects. Mean cell density, coefficient of variation, hexagonality ratio, maximum cell area, normal cell area, minimum cell area, and mean cell area were evaluated by non-contact specular microscopy. The parameters recorded in each group were compared.
resultsThe mean ages of the individuals in the meth and control groups were 32.36 ± 7.68 and 31.18 ± 4.79 years, respectively. The mean daily meth dose was 0.306 ± 0.154 g, mean weekly meth use was 2.70 ± 1.46 days, and mean total meth dose was 302.70 ± 296.04 g in the meth group (p = 0.456). The mean corneal endothelial cell count (ECD) values were 2692.82 ± 372.52 in the Meth group and 2869.7 ± 261.31 in the control group (p = 0.76). The mean coefficient of variation (CV) values were 30.76 ± 3.41 in the meth group and 29.21 ± 2.55 in the control group (p = 0.042). Mean hexagonality ratio (%) (HEX) values were 57.73 ± 9.38 in the meth group and 57.88 ± 9.96 in the control group (p = 0.949). A positive correlation was observed between CV and meth dose and duration of meth use (p = 0.011, p = 0.000, respectively).
conclusionThe results of our study indicate that the corneal endothelium is subjected to stress in patients with a methamphetamine use disorder. The CV value suggests that the usability of methamphetamine as a quantitative indicator in the evaluation of possible corneal endothelial toxicity is an area that needs to be supported by further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.