Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40797233›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Exploring the long-term psychological impact of socio-political crisis in Israel: a network analysis.

Liat Hamama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Liat HamamaThe Bob Shapell School of Social Work, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, 69978, Israel. hamama@tauex.tau.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5498-7443

Funding

Sarah Peleg Foundation at the Bob Shapell School of Social Work, Tel Aviv University No IDThe Dean of the Gershon H. Gordon Faculty of Social Sciences at Tel Aviv University No ID
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study explores the psychological effects of a socio-political crisis on right-wing versus left/center parties following the 2022 elections in Israel, amidst a proposed judicial reform. It specifically examines differences in psychological measures, such as stress disorder symptoms, positive affect, attitudes toward government actions, and health-related behaviors, along with internal resources-self-mastery, hope, and resilience-among participants affiliated with these political orientations across two distinct time-points.

methodsA diverse sample of Israeli citizens (811 individuals at Time 1 and 518 individuals at Time 2) completed self-report questionnaires. A network analysis was employed to observe how the abovementioned psychological measures and internal resources interacted within each group over time.

resultsSignificant differences were observed in stress disorder symptoms, positive affect, feelings toward government actions, and health-related behaviors between right-wing and left/center participants, although these differences diminished over time. Within the right-wing network, self-mastery and hope played pivotal roles. In contrast, associations with self-mastery, perceived threat exposure, and health-related behaviors among left/center participants decreased over time.

conclusionThe findings underscore the profound psychological toll of socio-political crises on individuals, regardless of political affiliation. They highlight the need for targeted public mental health support during periods of social unrest, recognizing that psychological responses may vary depending on individuals' political ideologies.

Indexed as

PoliticsAdultAgedFemaleHealth BehaviorHopeHumansIsraelMaleMiddle AgedResilience, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultJudicial reformLongitudinal studyPsychological impactResilienceSocial-political crisisStress

Identifiers

PMID40797233
PMCPMC12345088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.