ArticleJournal of clinical ultrasound : JCU2026
Assessing the Utility of Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography for Congenital Heart Disease Detection: Retrospective Cohort Analysis.
Article in Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing the Utility of Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography for Congenital Heart Disease Detection: Retrospective Cohort Analysis.Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTargeted neonatal echocardiography (TNE) is increasingly utilized by neonatologists to assess hemodynamics, particularly when cardiology-performed echocardiography (CPE) is unavailable. It is crucial that TNE screens and identifies structural abnormalities. This study evaluated the agreement between TNE and CPE in detecting significant congenital heart disease (CHD).
methodsThis retrospective, single-center cohort study included infants who underwent TNE between 2015 and 2019 and had at least one complete CPE before discharge. Infants with a known CHD diagnosis prior to TNE were excluded. Atrial septal defects (ASD) < 3 mm, peripheral pulmonary stenosis, and patent ductus arteriosus were excluded. Agreement between TNE and CPE was assessed using correlation coefficients and kappa statistics.
resultsA total of 339 infants with 954 TNE scans were included. TNE identified CHD in 41 infants, with all but one (a false positive bicuspid aortic valve) confirmed by CPE. TNE missed CHD in 29 infants (31 lesions), mostly minor, with only one case (pulmonary stenosis) requiring intervention. The overall agreement was 91.15%, with a kappa of 0.68 (p < 0.0001).
conclusionTNE demonstrated good agreement with CPE in detecting significant CHD in a low-risk neonatal population. Most missed lesions were minor, underscoring the importance of ongoing training and quality assurance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.