ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2025
Predicting 30-day in-hospital mortality in ICU asthma patients: a retrospective machine learning study with external validation.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lactate to albumin ratio LAR predicts mortality in critically ill adults with asthma across two cohorts.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of an online interpretable machine-learning model for predicting delirium risk in acute heart failure.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Translational Potential and Explainability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support for Adults in Intensive Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAsthma-related mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains poorly characterized, with no existing predictive models specifically designed for this high-risk population. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a machine learning-based model to predict 30-day in-hospital mortality among ICU patients with asthma.
methodsThe model was developed using data from MIMIC-IV 2.2 and externally validated on a subset of MIMIC-IV 3.1. Clinical variables from the first 24 h of ICU admission were extracted. Feature selection was conducted using both LASSO regression and the Boruta algorithm. Seven machine learning algorithms were trained and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. The best-performing model was identified based on internal and external validation results. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were employed to interpret feature importance. The final model was deployed as an interactive web-based tool.
resultsA total of 4385 ICU asthma patients were analyzed. The final XGBoost model, using 12 features, achieved the highest AUROC in both internal (0.83) and external (0.80) validation, and demonstrated the best calibration and net clinical benefit. SHAP analysis identified age, respiratory rate, RDW, urine output, and anion gap as top predictors. The model outperformed conventional ICU scores and is available as a web-based tool.
conclusionsWe developed and externally validated a robust prediction model for 30-day mortality in ICU patients with asthma. The model offers strong performance, interpretability, and clinical utility, supporting its use for real-time risk stratification and decision-making in critical care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.