Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40797148›Full record

ArticleBiologia futura2025

Adaptive response of cultivated rice (Oryza sativa ssp. indica) flowers to low sunlight intensity.

Debal Deb, Sreejata Dutta, Mahendra Nauri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biologia futura, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Debal DebCentre for Interdisciplinary Studies, Kolkata, 700001, India. Debal@posteo.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7230-659X
Sreejata DuttaDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Mahendra NauriCentre for Interdisciplinary Studies, Kolkata, 700001, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Records of sunlight intensity at anthesis of 388 rice landraces (with 32 replicated populations), flowering in the short-day season of 2022, reveal that under cloudy condition, the rice florets tend to open later, or the sunrise-to-anthesis duration (SAD) is longer when rice florets open than at sunny period. This difference in the length of SAD was statistically highly significant (p < 0.0001), confirmed by a two-sample permutation test with 10,000 iterations. This finding corroborates our general observation previously reported from a larger set of 1114 landraces (including the 388 landraces examined in this study). However, the intensity of sunlight at the flower opening time (FOT) may not remain uniformly sunny (high illuminance) or cloudy (low illuminance, < 40,000 lx) until the flower closing time (FCT). To understand the effect of uniformly low sunlight intensity, we subsequently recorded solar illuminance at FOT of 33 landrace populations (including 8 repeats). Half of each population was kept under artificial shade, compared to the other half exposed to sunlight. This experiment revealed that low illuminance, mimicking overcast days, significantly (p < 0.02) delays FOT and lengthens SAD, corroborating the pattern detected in our earlier findings. Permutation test with 10,000 iterations decisively confirms (p < 0.0001) the prolongation of SAD under shade and cloudy conditions. Experimental shading has an indeterminate effect on flower exposure duration (FED) of the same landraces. We surmise that the delayed FOT during natural cloudy period is an adaptation in rice plants in anticipation of rain, for protection of the pollen from rainwash.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalFlowersOryzaSunlightAnthesisFlower opening timeLandracesRiceSunlight intensitySunlight to anthesis duration

Identifiers

PMID40797148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.