ArticleBiologia futura2025
Adaptive response of cultivated rice (Oryza sativa ssp. indica) flowers to low sunlight intensity.
Article in Biologia futura, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Records of sunlight intensity at anthesis of 388 rice landraces (with 32 replicated populations), flowering in the short-day season of 2022, reveal that under cloudy condition, the rice florets tend to open later, or the sunrise-to-anthesis duration (SAD) is longer when rice florets open than at sunny period. This difference in the length of SAD was statistically highly significant (p < 0.0001), confirmed by a two-sample permutation test with 10,000 iterations. This finding corroborates our general observation previously reported from a larger set of 1114 landraces (including the 388 landraces examined in this study). However, the intensity of sunlight at the flower opening time (FOT) may not remain uniformly sunny (high illuminance) or cloudy (low illuminance, < 40,000 lx) until the flower closing time (FCT). To understand the effect of uniformly low sunlight intensity, we subsequently recorded solar illuminance at FOT of 33 landrace populations (including 8 repeats). Half of each population was kept under artificial shade, compared to the other half exposed to sunlight. This experiment revealed that low illuminance, mimicking overcast days, significantly (p < 0.02) delays FOT and lengthens SAD, corroborating the pattern detected in our earlier findings. Permutation test with 10,000 iterations decisively confirms (p < 0.0001) the prolongation of SAD under shade and cloudy conditions. Experimental shading has an indeterminate effect on flower exposure duration (FED) of the same landraces. We surmise that the delayed FOT during natural cloudy period is an adaptation in rice plants in anticipation of rain, for protection of the pollen from rainwash.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40797148What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.