Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40797067›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning model for predicting in-hospital cardiac mortality among atrial fibrillation patients.

Huasheng Lv, Xuehua Bi, Shuai Shang, Meng Wei, Xianhui Zhou, Kai Wang, Baopeng Tang, Yanmei Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Huasheng Lv *Department of Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Remodeling, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054, China.
Xuehua Bi *Department of Medical Engineering and Technology, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830017, China.
Shuai ShangDepartment of Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Remodeling, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054, China.
Meng WeiDepartment of Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Remodeling, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054, China.
Xianhui ZhouDepartment of Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Remodeling, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054, China.
Kai WangDepartment of Medical Engineering and Technology, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830017, China.
Baopeng Tang *Department of Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Remodeling, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054, China. tangbaopeng1111@163.com.
Yanmei Lu *Department of Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Remodeling, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054, China. luyanmei@xjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Top Young Scientific and Technological Talents of the Tianshan Talent Cultivation Program in Xinjiang 2022TSYCCX0101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study developed and validated a machine learning (ML) model to predict in-hospital cardiac mortality in 18,727 atrial fibrillation (AF) patients using electronic medical record data. Four ML algorithms-random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), deep neural network, and logistic regression-were applied to 79 clinical variables, including demographics, vital signs, comorbidities, lifestyle factors, and laboratory parameters. The XGBoost model achieved the best performance, with an area under the curve of 0.964 ± 0.014 in the training set and 0.932 ± 0.057 in the validation set, alongside precision, accuracy, and recall of 0.909 ± 0.021, 0.910 ± 0.021, and 0.897 ± 0.038, respectively. Shapley Additive Explanations identified key predictors such as thyroid function indices (e.g., total triiodothyronine, total thyroxine), procalcitonin, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and international normalized ratio. This interpretable model holds promise for improving early risk stratification and individualized care in AF patients. Prospective, multi-center validation is needed to confirm its generalizability.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationHospital MortalityMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsAtrial fibrillationDeathMachine learningPredictive modelling

Identifiers

PMID40797067
PMCPMC12343966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.