Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40797059›Full record

ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2025

Development and Validation of An Interpretable Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Placenta Previa Following Cesarean Section: A Multicenter Study.

Mianmian Li, Xinhui Su, Wenxin Liao, Li Huang, Yihong Yang, Xizi Wu, Yao Fan, Jing Liu, Xin Yang, Zhen Zeng and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mianmian LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Xinhui SuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Wenxin LiaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Li HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Yihong YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Xizi WuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Yao FanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Jing LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Xin YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Zhen ZengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Wencheng DingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Wanjiang ZengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
Xiaoyan XuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China. xuxiaoyan@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-0996-6819

Funding

Key Research and Development Program of Hubei Province 2022BCA041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study is to predict the occurrence of postpartum hemorrhage in women with placenta previa based on machine learning. This retrospective study enrolled 845 singleton pregnant patients with placenta previa from two hospitals. They were allocated into a training cohort (n = 403), a testing cohort (n = 174), and the external validation cohort (n = 268). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were employed to select clinical variables (p < 0.05), which were subsequently utilized to develop 11 machine learning prediction models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN), and specificity (SPE) were used to evaluate the performance of the models. Besides, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to interpret the role and effectiveness of variables in the predictive model. Three machine learning models with the best predictive performance were combined into a Prediction Ensemble Classifier through voting. The Gradient Boosting Machine demonstrated the best predictive performance. In the validation cohort, AUC of the Gradient Boosting Machine model is 0.810(95% CI 0.754-0.865), ACC was 0.765(95% CI 0.716-0.813), SEN was 0.613(95% CI 0.513-0.723), while these values of the Prediction Ensemble Classifier were 0.813(0.756-0.871), 0.806(0.757-0.854), and 0.480(0.375-0.597), respectively. The importance of SHAP variables in the model, ranked from high to low, is as follows: d-dimer, ultrasound diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum, neutrophils, prothrombin time, and platelets. The Gradient Boosting Machine model demonstrated excellent performance in predicting postpartum hemorrhage in cases of placenta previa. Furthermore, SHAP analysis enabled interpretation of the variables in the model.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionMachine LearningPlacenta PreviaPostpartum HemorrhageAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsMachine learningMaternal healthPlacenta previaPostpartum hemorrhagePrediction modelValidation

Identifiers

PMID40797059
PMCPMC12443912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.