ArticleBehavior research methods2025
Boundaries in the eyes: Measure event segmentation during naturalistic video watching using eye tracking.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of Event Segmentation in Language and Cognition: Evidence From Dwell Times and Eye Movements.Cognitive science · 2026Article
- Behavioral and eye-tracking investigation of event segmentation following short video watching.NPJ science of learning · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During naturalistic information processing, individuals spontaneously segment their continuous experiences into discrete events, a phenomenon known as event segmentation. Traditional methods for assessing this process, which include subjective reports and neuroimaging techniques, often disrupt real-time segmentation or are costly and time-intensive. Our study investigated the potential of measuring event segmentation by recording and analyzing eye movements while participants viewed naturalistic videos. We collected eye movement data from healthy young adults as they watched commercial films (N = 104), or online Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) educational courses (N = 44). We analyzed changes in pupil size and eye movement speed near event boundaries and employed inter-subject correlation analysis (ISC) and hidden Markov models (HMM) to identify patterns indicative of event segmentation. We observed that both the speed of eye movements and pupil size dynamically responded to event boundaries, exhibiting heightened sensitivity to high-strength boundaries. Our analyses further revealed that event boundaries synchronized eye movements across participants. These boundaries can be effectively identified by HMM, yielding higher within-event similarity values and aligned with human-annotated boundaries. Importantly, HMM-based event segmentation metrics responded to experimental manipulations and predicted learning outcomes. This study provided a comprehensive computational framework for measuring event segmentation using eye-tracking. With the widespread accessibility of low-cost eye-tracking devices, the ability to measure event segmentation from eye movement data promises to deepen our understanding of this process in diverse real-world settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40797057What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.