ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2025
Evidence on the effect of in-utero cannabis exposure in neonates.
Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medical Cannabis During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: Is the Concern Fully Evidence-Based?Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Recreational Cannabis Use During Human Pregnancy: Its Effects on the Placenta and Endocannabinoid System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global prevalence of cannabis use during pregnancy is increasing, driven by perceived therapeutic benefits and greater societal acceptance. Concurrently, the psychoactive potency of cannabis products has risen significantly, due to increase in concentrations of Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) from 5% to 30%. THC crosses the placenta, disrupts the endocannabinoid system critical for neurodevelopment, and accumulates in fetal tissues. THC is transferred into breast milk, with breastfed infants receiving ~2.5% of the maternal dose, raising concerns regarding neurodevelopmental consequences. An increasing number of studies and metanalysis have demonstrated association of prenatal cannabis exposure with low birth weight, preterm birth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and reduced Apgar scores. Longitudinal studies show brain alterations in offspring, affecting memory, attention, and executive function. The inability to conduct randomized controlled trials due to ethical constraints necessitates reliance on observational studies, underscoring the need for rigorous longitudinal research to delineate causality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40797024What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.