Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40796980›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2026

Study on evaluation of effects of electromagnetic radiation on pollen viability in some commonly occurring plant species following different staining methods.

Ankita Sharma, Neeru Bala, Mahima Sharma, Jatinder Kaur Katnoria, Shalini Bahel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ankita SharmaDepartment of Botanical and Environmental Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India.
Neeru BalaDepartment of Botanical and Environmental Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India.
Mahima SharmaDepartment of Botanical and Environmental Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India.
Jatinder Kaur KatnoriaDepartment of Botanical and Environmental Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India.
Shalini BahelDepartment of Electronics Technology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India. shalini.elec@gmail.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to electromagnetic radiation (EMR) at varied power densities can profoundly affect fertilization in plants by posing physiological stress and impairing pollen's ability to fertilize. In the present study, four sites (under exposure to EMR at varied power densities) like S-1 (1 μW/cm

Indexed as

Electromagnetic RadiationPollenStaining and Labeling2,3,5 Triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC)Aceto-orceinAlexander’sElectromagnetic radiationLugol’sPower density

Identifiers

PMID40796980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.