ArticleScientific reports2025
Influence of load-bearing wall material properties on building mine-induced dynamic response.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Construction Material Type on the Dynamic Response of Low-Rise Buildings.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Study on negative skin friction of piles induced by mining subsidence using transparent soil model tests.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various construction materials are used in contemporary building structures. Modern buildings face impacts like dead, live, snow, and wind load. They may also face extreme conditions, such as seismic activity, which can threaten their safety and functionality. Few publications address how construction material choice affects a building’s dynamic response to seismic impacts, including mining tremors. The main goal of this article is to analyse the effect of load-bearing wall materials on a building’s dynamic response to mine-induced vibrations. Seven materials with different properties were considered: two types of reinforced concrete (standard and high-strength oil palm shell lightweight), cellular concrete, standard brick, and three types of sand-lime bricks. Numerical analysis was based on a low-rise building with a typical wall-bearing structure. The finite element method (FEM) was used to create a three-dimensional (3D) model of the building. The validity of the numerical model was verified through in situ experimental measurements of actual vibrations induced by mining tremors. The numerical predictions showed sufficient accuracy for a building with load-bearing walls made of brick. The study found that the properties of construction materials significantly impact the building’s dynamic behaviour under mine-induced excitations. The natural vibration frequencies of the building varied depending on the wall material used. The maximum vibration acceleration values due to mine tremors also varied significantly with the material type. Differences in maximum acceleration between materials reached up to 56.6% in some tremors. The highest values were observed for cellular concrete walls, which have the lowest stiffness. Using this material in areas affected by mine tremors is not advisable due to the high level of dynamic response, which could cause damage and negatively affect inhabitants. Fourier analyses of the calculated acceleration waveforms revealed differences in dominant vibration frequencies for different materials and tremors with varying energy levels. Although the vibration shapes of buildings with walls made of different materials were similar, the magnitudes of relative displacements differed. The dynamic response is complex, but for weaker tremors, displacement shapes in the longitudinal building direction dominated for all materials. The study concluded that the properties of load-bearing wall materials significantly influence the dynamic behaviour of a building subjected to mine-induced vibrations. This article makes significant scientific contributions and is innovative in several aspects. It presents a validated 3D FEM model for the numerical estimation of a building’s dynamic response to mine-induced kinematic loading. It also compares the effects of various construction materials on the dynamic response of buildings to mine-induced vibrations. By examining seven different materials within a single study, it adds valuable knowledge to the field. Additionally, it provides a practical finding that low-stiffness materials (especially cellular concrete) can lead to increased dynamic responses in mining areas, potentially posing a risk of damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.