Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40796941›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Influence of load-bearing wall material properties on building mine-induced dynamic response.

Maciej Zajac, Krystyna Kuzniar, Tadeusz Tatara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maciej ZajacInstitute of Technology, University of the National Education Commission, ul. Podchorazych 2, Krakow, 30-084, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4598-0746
Krystyna KuzniarInstitute of Technology, University of the National Education Commission, ul. Podchorazych 2, Krakow, 30-084, Poland. krystyna.kuzniar@uken.krakow.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4617-9117
Tadeusz TataraFaculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, ul. Warszawska 24, Krakow, 31-155, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4071-2358

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various construction materials are used in contemporary building structures. Modern buildings face impacts like dead, live, snow, and wind load. They may also face extreme conditions, such as seismic activity, which can threaten their safety and functionality. Few publications address how construction material choice affects a building’s dynamic response to seismic impacts, including mining tremors. The main goal of this article is to analyse the effect of load-bearing wall materials on a building’s dynamic response to mine-induced vibrations. Seven materials with different properties were considered: two types of reinforced concrete (standard and high-strength oil palm shell lightweight), cellular concrete, standard brick, and three types of sand-lime bricks. Numerical analysis was based on a low-rise building with a typical wall-bearing structure. The finite element method (FEM) was used to create a three-dimensional (3D) model of the building. The validity of the numerical model was verified through in situ experimental measurements of actual vibrations induced by mining tremors. The numerical predictions showed sufficient accuracy for a building with load-bearing walls made of brick. The study found that the properties of construction materials significantly impact the building’s dynamic behaviour under mine-induced excitations. The natural vibration frequencies of the building varied depending on the wall material used. The maximum vibration acceleration values due to mine tremors also varied significantly with the material type. Differences in maximum acceleration between materials reached up to 56.6% in some tremors. The highest values were observed for cellular concrete walls, which have the lowest stiffness. Using this material in areas affected by mine tremors is not advisable due to the high level of dynamic response, which could cause damage and negatively affect inhabitants. Fourier analyses of the calculated acceleration waveforms revealed differences in dominant vibration frequencies for different materials and tremors with varying energy levels. Although the vibration shapes of buildings with walls made of different materials were similar, the magnitudes of relative displacements differed. The dynamic response is complex, but for weaker tremors, displacement shapes in the longitudinal building direction dominated for all materials. The study concluded that the properties of load-bearing wall materials significantly influence the dynamic behaviour of a building subjected to mine-induced vibrations. This article makes significant scientific contributions and is innovative in several aspects. It presents a validated 3D FEM model for the numerical estimation of a building’s dynamic response to mine-induced kinematic loading. It also compares the effects of various construction materials on the dynamic response of buildings to mine-induced vibrations. By examining seven different materials within a single study, it adds valuable knowledge to the field. Additionally, it provides a practical finding that low-stiffness materials (especially cellular concrete) can lead to increased dynamic responses in mining areas, potentially posing a risk of damage.

Indexed as

Building structureConstruction material propertiesDynamic responseMine-induced vibrationsNumerical analysis

Identifiers

PMID40796941
PMCPMC12343800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.