Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40796931›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Study on the resilience of command and control networks to cascading failures based on asymmetric group dependencies.

Biao Zhao, Menglin Wang, Weiting Lin, QiZeng Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Biao ZhaoInformation Support Force Engineering University, Wuhan, China.
Menglin WangInformation Support Force Engineering University, Wuhan, China.
Weiting LinInformation Support Force Engineering University, Wuhan, China.
QiZeng ZhangInformation Support Force Engineering University, Wuhan, China. zqz2017@nudt.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In joint operations, Command and Control (C2) Networks are crucial to operational effectiveness, directly impacting the coordination and efficiency of the operational system. As the interdependence between Information and Communication (IC) Networks and Command and Control (C2) Networks becomes increasingly tight, cascading failures have emerged as a significant factor affecting network reliability. This paper investigates the resilience of cascading failures in coupled dependency networks of command and control and Information and Communication (IC) Networks. It proposes an asymmetric group-dependency coupled network model and introduces four improved load redistribution strategies based on this model. To address the cascading failure issue caused by the one-way dependency between Command and Control (C2) Networks and Information and Communication (IC) Networks, the paper uses a nonlinear capacity-load model to simulate the cascading failure process of the coupled network and conducts simulation experiments under different attack modes and parameters to comprehensively evaluate the resilience of the coupled network. The results show that the four proposed load redistribution strategies effectively enhance the resilience of the coupled network under various attack modes and intensities. In particular, the comprehensive redistribution strategy (CR) demonstrates higher robustness and resilience across multiple scenarios. Additionally, the study reveals that simply increasing the node load capacity and repair capability does not always lead to improved resilience performance for the coupled network. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed comprehensive redistribution strategy achieves 15-20% improvement in network resilience compared to traditional methods, with optimal performance observed at overload parameter [Formula: see text] and recovery coefficient [Formula: see text].

Identifiers

PMID40796931
PMCPMC12343908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.