Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40796903›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Sleep in the academic sphere: identifying sleep profiles and their influencing factors using latent profile analysis in German university students.

Johanna M Schmickler, Simon Blaschke, Filip Mess, Nils Olson, Barbara Reiner, Thorsten Schulz, Julian Friedrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Johanna M SchmicklerAssociate Professorship of Didactics in Sport and Health, Department Health and Sport Sciences, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Am Olympiacampus 11, 80809, Munich, Germany. johanna.schmickler@tum.de.
Simon BlaschkeAssociate Professorship of Didactics in Sport and Health, Department Health and Sport Sciences, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Am Olympiacampus 11, 80809, Munich, Germany.
Filip MessAssociate Professorship of Didactics in Sport and Health, Department Health and Sport Sciences, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Am Olympiacampus 11, 80809, Munich, Germany.
Nils OlsonChair of Preventive Pediatrics, Department Health and Sport Sciences, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Barbara ReinerChair of Preventive Pediatrics, Department Health and Sport Sciences, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Thorsten SchulzChair of Preventive Pediatrics, Department Health and Sport Sciences, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Julian FriedrichAssociate Professorship of Didactics in Sport and Health, Department Health and Sport Sciences, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Am Olympiacampus 11, 80809, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor sleep quality is a prevalent issue among university students, raising concerns for both individual well-being and public health. While the heterogeneity of sleep quality has been recognized, research examining distinct sleep quality subtypes and their influencing factors is still developing. This study aimed to explore sleep quality profiles among German university students and identify socio-demographic, health-related, and academic factors associated with profile membership.

methodsA total of 1,526 university students from various academic disciplines participated in the study. Data were collected via an online questionnaire, including the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Perceived Stress Scale, Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students, and questions on socio-demographic, health-related, and academic factors. Latent profile analysis and multinomial logistic regression were used to analyze the data.

resultsWe identified four distinct sleep quality profiles among our participants: the Average Sleep Profile (78.5%), the Insomnia Risk Profile (8.2%), the Above Average Profile (7.2%), and the Medicated Sleepiness Profile (6.1%). Prolonged sleep onset latency and daytime sleepiness were common across most profiles, indicating that these are widespread sleep-related issues among students. Female students (OR = 2.75, p < 0.001) and those with higher stress levels (OR = 1.09, p < 0.001) were more likely to belong to the Insomnia Risk Profile. Older students (aged 23 years or above) (OR = 1.88, p = 0.030), those enrolled in State examination programs (OR = 5.73, p = 0.016) as well as students experiencing higher stress (OR = 1.08, p < 0.001) and academic workload (OR = 1.01, p = 0.022), had an increased likelihood of belonging to the Medicated Sleepiness Profile. Students reporting better subjective health status were less likely to be assigned to profiles characterized by maladaptive sleep patterns.

conclusionThese findings underscore the variability in sleep quality among university students, offering insights for the development of tailored preventive interventions. Future sleep promotion programs should consider individual differences when designing strategies to address the diverse sleep challenges faced by students.

Indexed as

SleepSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersSleep QualityStudentsAdolescentAdultFemaleGermanyHumansMaleStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung AdultHealth promotionHealth servicesHigher educationPerson-centered approach

Identifiers

PMID40796903
PMCPMC12345099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.