Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40796890›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics & chromatin2025

Direction and modality of transcription changes caused by TAD boundary disruption in Slc29a3/Unc5b locus depends on tissue-specific epigenetic context.

Paul Salnikov, Polina Belokopytova, Alexandra Yan, Emil Viesná, Alexey Korablev, Irina Serova, Varvara Lukyanchikova, Yana Stepanchuk, Nikita Torgunakov, Savelii Tikhomirov and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Transcription and Three-Dimensional Genome Organization: Cause, Consequence, or Coordination?BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Paul SalnikovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Polina BelokopytovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Alexandra YanInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Emil ViesnáInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Alexey KorablevInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Irina SerovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Varvara LukyanchikovaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Yana StepanchukInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Nikita TorgunakovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Savelii TikhomirovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Veniamin FishmanInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Novosibirsk, Russia. minja-f@ya.ru.

Funding

Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation 075-15-2024-539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTopologically associating domains (TADs) are believed to play a role in the regulation of gene expression by constraining or guiding interactions between the regulatory elements. While the impact of TAD perturbations is typically studied in developmental genes with highly cell-type-specific expression patterns, this study examines genes with broad expression profiles separated by a strong insulator boundary. We focused on the mouse Slc29a3/Unc5b locus, which encompasses two distinct TADs containing ubiquitously expressed and essential for viability genes. We disrupted the CTCF-boundary between these TADs and analyzed the resulting changes in gene expression.

resultsDeletion of four CTCF binding sites at the TAD boundary altered local chromatin architecture, abolishing pre‑existing loops and creating novel long‑range interactions that spanned the original TAD boundary. Using UMI-assisted targeted RNA-seq we evaluated transcriptional changes of Unc5b, Slc29a3, Psap, Vsir, Cdh23, and Sgpl1 across various organs. We found that TAD boundary disruption led to variable transcriptional responses, where not only the magnitude but also the direction of gene expression changes were tissue-specific. Current hypotheses on genome architecture function, such as enhancer competition and hijacking, as well as genomic deep learning models, only partially explain these transcriptional changes, highlighting the need for further investigation into the mechanisms underlying TAD function and gene regulation.

conclusionsDisrupting the insulator element between broadly expressed genes resulted in moderate, tissue-dependent transcriptional alterations, rather than uniformly activating or silencing the target genes. These findings show that TAD boundaries contribute to context‑specific regulation even at housekeeping loci and underscore the need for refined models to predict the effects of non‑coding structural variants.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticMembrane Transport ProteinsTranscription, GeneticAnimalsBinding SitesCCCTC-Binding FactorChromatinMiceOrgan SpecificityCCCTC-Binding FactorChromatinCtcf protein, mouseMembrane Transport Proteins

Identifiers

PMID40796890
PMCPMC12341078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.