ArticleBMC research notes2025
Exploring novel blood-based DNA methylation biomarkers for alzheimer's disease via targeted sequencing of highly variable CpG sites.
Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDementia, particularly Alzheimer’s disease (AD), continues to be a major public health concern due to population aging, yet minimally invasive biomarkers for early diagnosis have not been established. DNA methylation (DNAm) has recently attracted considerable attention as a promising biomarker. This study aimed to identify blood-based DNAm biomarkers for early detection of AD.
resultsWe analysed blood-derived DNA from 48 patients with AD (from Biobank Japan) and 48 age- and sex-matched controls (from the Tohoku Medical Megabank Biobank) using Apolipoprotein ε type 4 (APOE)-associated genotype analysis and targeted-bisulfite sequencing. High-risk APOE genotypes were more frequent in AD patients (23/48, [47.9%]) than in controls (6/48, [12.5%]). A typical case-control and APOE genotype-stratified epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) did not identify any genome-wide significant CpG sites. Although the primary findings were negative, some top CpG sites appeared in both analyses, including loci on the Cell Adhesion Molecule 1 (CADM1), Tubulin alpha 1b (TUBA1B), and Exocyst complex component 2 (EXOC2) genes, which have previously been linked to AD-related pathways. The relatively early clinical stage and uncertainty of disease onset might have limited detection sensitivity. Longitudinal studies with refined staging and multi-omics integration might clarify the biomarker potential of blood DNAm in AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.