ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
A novel technique for posterior internal fixation of acetabular fractures.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the surgical technique and clinical outcomes of the Universal Self-locking Anatomic Plate for Acetabulum (USAPA).
methodsA retrospective analysis of 155 patients with complete follow-up data from December 2014 to December 2020 was conducted. The study included 119 males and 36 females, aged 18–82 (mean: 40.31 ± 6.96) years. Among the cases, 65 were on the left side and 90 on the right side. The time from injury to surgery ranged from 3.5 to 51 (mean: 5.43 ± 2.84) days. The Letournel–Judet classification included posterior wall fractures in 67 cases, transverse with posterior wall in 51 cases, anterior column with posterior wall in 15 cases, transverse in 10 cases, double-column in 10 cases, anterior column with posterior hemitransverse in 2 cases, T type in 2 cases, posterior column with posterior wall in 1 case, and Pipkin’s type IV in 1 case. The Kocher–Langenbeck approach was applied. Matta’s imaging and modified Merle Aubigne’s criteria were used to assess the outcome. The clinical outcomes and surgery-related complications were compared with the literature.
resultsThe mean implant placement time was 17.0 ± 2.5 min, the mean operation time was 114.25 ± 21.5 min, the mean intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy was 2.5 ± 0.5 times, the mean intraoperative blood loss was 368.0 ± 12.3 mL, and the mean follow-up duration was 49.5 ± 1.2 months. The mean clinical healing time was 108.7 ± 9.2 days. The rate of excellent and good postoperative imaging assessment was 99.4%, while the rate of functional rates at the last follow-up was 95.5%. Postoperative complications occurred in 3.9% of cases, with no instances of mortality, incisional infection, or sciatic nerve injury. There were no cases of screw penetration into the joint, loss of reduction, implant failure, or nonunion. One case of heterotopic ossification was observed, along with two cases of post-traumatic arthritis. Additionally, one patient with a Pipkin type IV fracture developed femoral head necrosis, ultimately requiring total hip arthroplasty, and two cases exhibited delayed wound healing with incisional fat liquefaction. Overall, intraoperative efficiency, postoperative imaging results, and clinical outcomes were superior compared to those reported in the literature.
conclusionThe USAPA aligns with the acetabulum’s anatomy and biomechanics, providing effective fixation of the weight-bearing dome and posterior wall fragments with safe, efficient screw placement. Compared to similar internal fixation techniques, it offers superior outcomes and fewer complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.