ArticleScientific reports2025
A CrossMod-Transformer deep learning framework for multi-modal pain detection through EDA and ECG fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-Time Pain Assessment from Electrodermal Activity Using Deep Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- ROS 4 healthcare: a framework for physiological human sensing for social, assistive, rehabilitation, and medical robotics.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2026Article
- Hybrid Convolutional Vision Transformer for Robust Low-Channel sEMG Hand Gesture Recognition: A Comparative Study with CNNs.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Integrating artificial intelligence into Korean medicine: Insights from neural and pulse signal analysis.Integrative medicine research · 2025Article
- Machine learning methods on BioVid heat pain database for pain intensity estimation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pain is a multifaceted phenomenon that significantly affects a large portion of the global population. Objective pain assessment is essential for developing effective management strategies, which in turn contribute to more efficient and responsive healthcare systems. However, accurately evaluating pain remains a complex challenge due to subtle physiological and behavioural indicators, individual-specific pain responses, and the need for continuous patient monitoring. Automatic pain assessment systems offer promising, technology-driven solutions to support and enhance various aspects of the pain evaluation process. Physiological indicators offer valuable insights into pain-related states and are generally less influenced by individual variability compared to behavioural modalities, such as facial expressions. Skin conductance, regulated by sweat gland activity, and the heart's electrical signals are both influenced by changes in the sympathetic nervous system. Biosignals, such as electrodermal activity (EDA) and electrocardiogram (ECG), can, therefore, objectively capture the body's physiological responses to painful stimuli. This paper proposes a novel multi-modal ensemble deep learning framework that combines electrodermal activity and electrocardiogram signals for automatic pain recognition. The proposed framework includes a uni-modal approach (FCN-ALSTM-Transformer) comprising a Fully Convolutional Network, Attention-based LSTM, and a Transformer block to integrate features extracted by these models. Additionally, a multi-modal approach (CrossMod-Transformer) is introduced, featuring a dedicated Transformer architecture that fuses electrodermal activity and electrocardiogram signals. Experimental evaluations were primarily conducted on the BioVid dataset, with further cross-dataset validation using the AI4PAIN 2025 dataset to assess the generalisability of the proposed method. Notably, the CrossMod-Transformer achieved an accuracy of 87.52% on Biovid and 75.83% on AI4PAIN, demonstrating strong performance across independent datasets and outperforming several state-of-the-art uni-modal and multi-modal methods. These results highlight the potential of the proposed framework to improve the reliability of automatic multi-modal pain recognition and support the development of more objective and inclusive clinical assessment tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.