ArticleMemory & cognition2026
The effects of time and self-relevance on collective memories and collective future thinking.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Self-serving biases shape the relationship between future thinking and remembering of elections.Communications psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined the influence of time and self-relevance on collective memories. Participants recalled their memories of two events from 2020 that differed in self-relevance: the COVID-19 pandemic and a political event. Furthermore, each event was recalled at two time points: in 2021 and 2022. In 2021, participants also imagined a future pandemic and a future political event (the dissolution of the EU) to assess the extent to which representations of the collective future rely on representations of the collective past. Given the wide and complex nature of collective memory, we measured the type of information people remembered and imagined (personal vs. collective) and the common themes discussed by participants. Results showed that, in 2021, people recalled more personal information about the pandemic than the political event. By 2022, pandemic memories were recalled with more collective than personal information, similarly to political event memories, which remained primarily collective. For imagined future events, participants reported more collective than personal elements. Moreover, the themes described when imagining a future pandemic were similar to the ones recalled about the past pandemic. Themes about the pandemic also evolved into a more comprehensive view of the events over time. Overall, the findings suggest that the content of collective memories, especially self-relevant ones, evolves over time, emphasizing the constructive nature of collective memories and how it shapes collective future thinking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40796721What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.