Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40796686›Full record

ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2025

Are [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging and cell blood count-derived biomarkers robust non-invasive surrogates for tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in early-stage breast cancer?

Romain-David Seban, Louis Rebaud, Lounes Djerroudi, Anne Vincent-Salomon, Francois-Clement Bidard, Laurence Champion, Irene Buvat

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Romain-David SebanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Institut Curie, 92210, Saint-Cloud, France. romain.seban@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2584-5478
Louis RebaudLaboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie, Inserm U1288, Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris Saclay University, 91400, Orsay, France.
Lounes DjerroudiDepartment of Pathology, Institut Curie, 75005, Paris, France.
Anne Vincent-SalomonDepartment of Pathology, Institut Curie, 75005, Paris, France.
Francois-Clement BidardDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, UVSQ/Paris-Saclay University, 92210, Saint-Cloud, France.
Laurence ChampionDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Institut Curie, 92210, Saint-Cloud, France.
Irene BuvatLaboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie, Inserm U1288, Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris Saclay University, 91400, Orsay, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are key immune biomarkers associated with prognosis and treatment response in early-stage breast cancer (BC), particularly in the triple-negative subtype. This study aimed to evaluate whether [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging and routine cell blood count (CBC)-derived biomarkers can serve as non-invasive surrogates for TILs, using machine-learning models. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 358 patients with biopsy-proven early-stage invasive BC who underwent pre-treatment [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging. PET-derived biomarkers were extracted from the primary tumor, lymph nodes, and lymphoid organs (spleen and bone marrow). CBC-derived biomarkers included neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). TILs were assessed histologically and categorized as low (0-10%), intermediate (11-59%), or high (≥ 60%). Correlations were assessed using Spearman's rank coefficient, and classification and regression models were built using several machine-learning algorithms.

resultsTumor SUVmax and tumor SUVmean showed the highest correlation with TIL levels (ρ = 0.29 and 0.30 respectively, p < 0.001 for both), but overall associations between TILs and PET or CBC-derived biomarkers were weak. No CBC-derived biomarker showed significant correlation or discriminative performance. Machine-learning models failed to predict TIL levels with satisfactory accuracy (maximum balanced accuracy = 0.66). Lymphoid organ metrics (SLR, BLR) and CBC-derived parameters did not significantly enhance predictive value. DISCUSSION: In this study, neither [18F]FDG PET/CT nor routine CBC-derived biomarkers reliably predict TILs levels in early-stage BC. This observation was made in presence of potential scanner-related variability and for a restricted set of usual PET metrics. Future models should incorporate more targeted imaging approaches, such as immunoPET, to non-invasively assess immune infiltration with higher specificity and improve personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFluorodeoxyglucose F18Lymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Cell CountFemaleHumansMachine LearningMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorFluorodeoxyglucose F18[18]FDG PET/CTBreast cancerMachine LearningTumor-infiltrating lymphocytesTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID40796686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.