ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Worse prognosis for breast cancer diagnosed in advanced pregnancy and shortly postpartum: an update of the Dutch pregnancy-associated breast cancer cohort.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trimester of diagnosis affects tumor characteristics and survival in breast cancer during pregnancy: first results from the STURGATE collaboration.NPJ breast cancer · 2026Article
- Estrogen metabolism pathways in pregnancy and subsequent breast cancer risk: a prospective follow-up study.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Pregnancy vs. Postpartum Breast Cancer: Distinct Tumor Biology and Survival Trends in a Contemporary Cohort.Cancers · 2025Article
- Pregnancy-associated breast cancer: gestational weight gain impact and nomogram validation.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Estrogen Metabolism Pathways in Pregnancy and Subsequent Breast Cancer Risk: A Prospective Follow-up Study.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBreast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy (PrBC) or postpartum (PPBC) is associated with a poorer prognosis, and earlier research indicated that outcomes differ based on timing of diagnosis. We updated and expanded our Dutch nationwide pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) cohort, now also including patients diagnosed within one year after an interrupted pregnancy (AABC), to compare disease characteristics and prognosis across PrBC-, PPBC- and AABC subgroups and to non-PABC patients.
methodsAll breast cancer pathology reports of women < 45 years in the Netherlands (1988-2022) were screened to identify patients diagnosed with PrBC, PPBC (< 12 months postpartum) or AABC (< 12 months after pregnancy interruption). PABC patients were 1:3 matched on age and year of diagnosis to non-PABC breast cancer patients.
resultsIn our PABC cohort (N = 787), the majority was diagnosed during pregnancy (n = 471, 60%). Two distinct prognostic subgroups were observed: a favorable group including trimester 1 PrBC, PPBC 6-12 months postpartum and AABC, and an unfavorable group diagnosed later in pregnancy (trimesters 2 and 3) or shortly postpartum (< 6 months). PABC patients showed overall, in comparison to non-PABC controls, poorer histopathological characteristics (more grade III and triple negative tumors) and a significantly worse 5-year overall survival (77% vs. 85%), persisting in multivariable analysis (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.06 - 2.33, P = 0.025).
conclusionsPABC patients diagnosed in advanced pregnancy or shortly postpartum are most at risk for aggressive histopathology and an unfavorable prognosis. This highlights the need for in-depth analyses between specific PABC subgroups to elucidate the etiologic mechanisms involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.