ArticleScientific reports2025
Use of an anatomical atlas in real-time EIT reconstructions of ventilation and pulsatile perfusion in preterm infants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in experimental and clinical applications of chest electrical impedance tomography: a narrative review.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Review
- An improved Wexler algorithm for electrical impedance tomography using finite element method and gradient based overrelaxation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a bedside imaging technique in which voltage data arising from current applied on electrodes is used to compute images of admittivity in real time. Due to the severe ill-posedness of the inverse problem, good spatial resolution poses a challenge in EIT. Conversely, the temporal resolution is high, facilitating dynamic bedside imaging. In this work, we propose a real-time linearized reconstruction algorithm that makes use of an anatomical atlas to provide prior spatial information at two stages of the reconstruction with the goal of improving the spatial resolution. The algorithm updates a non-constant initial estimate of an anatomically relevant distribution of conductivity and susceptivity obtained from the mean of the atlas, and using the Schur complement method as a post-processing technique. Two atlases are constructed from a database of CT scans of 89 infants; one for the reconstruction of ventilation and one for the reconstruction of pulsatile perfusion. The algorithm is applied to data collected on 16 premature infants with lung disease of prematurity and 5 healthy control infants to reconstruct conductivity and susceptivity images of both ventilation and pulsatile perfusion in real time using the ACT 5 EIT system. EIT parameters describing homogeneity of ventilation distribution throughout the lung and the distribution anterior/posterior and in the left versus right lung were computed for each infant. The left/right ventilation distribution was found to distinguish between the healthy and the preterm infants with statistical significance (p-value< 0.05). The reconstructions demonstrate qualitatively improved resolution when compared to the NOSER algorithm currently used on the ACT 5 system for real-time bedside imaging, and the ability to image changes due to ventilation and pulsatile perfusion, as well as regional inhomogeneity. Since CT scans were not available for these infants, there is no gold standard for validation. In conclusion, we present a novel real-time algorithm with the goal of improving spatial resolution for bedside imaging with EIT for conductivity and susceptivity imaging of ventilation and pulsatile perfusion, with the potential to aid in the evaluation of lung function in infants at the bedside.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.