ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning-assisted quantitative metabolomics of West African patients with advanced breast cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Gini coefficient as a surrogate for the regulability or homeostasis of metabolite concentrations: focus on ergothioneine.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026Article
- Decoding the gut microbiota metabolite-matrix metalloproteinase-3 axis in breast cancer: a multi-omics and network pharmacology study.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Urinary metabolite profiles differ by tumor size and malignancy in dogs with mammary tumors.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Machine learning-guided analysis of metabolomic alterations in Parkinson's disease with comorbid symptoms.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we conducted a targeted quantitative metabolomic analysis of 630 metabolites in the plasma of 78 West African patients at the time of breast cancer diagnosis and prior to any treatment. Most of these patients were at an advanced stage of the disease. The data were compared with those of 79 healthy controls using a combination of several machine learning approaches and statistical analyses. The predictive models obtained with the machine learning algorithms were comparable, with the best AUC of 0.878 obtained with ridge logistic regression using Boruta feature selection. The most consistently identified discriminating metabolites across univariate analyses with Benjamini-Hochberg correction, OPLS-DA analyses, and the best machine learning approach were thirteen, out of a total of 63 discriminating metabolites identified cumulatively by the three approaches. This signature highlights several key biological processes, including oxidative stress, disrupted neurotransmitter profiles, altered nitric oxide and xanthine oxidase metabolism, and impaired energy metabolism. The involvement of new metabolites significantly deregulated in breast cancer, such as asymmetric dimethylarginine and hexosylceramides, have also been identified. The identified metabolomic signature provides a comprehensive and global view of the blood biochemical phenotype associated with advanced breast cancer at the time of diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.