Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40796631›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Impact of gas background on XFEL single-particle imaging.

Tong You, Johan Bielecki, Filipe R N C Maia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tong YouLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Box 596, 75124, Uppsala, Sweden.
Johan BieleckiEuropean XFEL, Holzkoppel 4, 22869, Schenefeld, Germany.
Filipe R N C MaiaLaboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Box 596, 75124, Uppsala, Sweden. filipe.maia@icm.uu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-particle imaging (SPI) using X-ray free-electron Lasers (XFELs) offers the potential to determine protein structures at high spatial and temporal resolutions without the need for crystallization or vitrification. However, the technique faces challenges due to weak diffraction signals from single proteins and significant background scattering from gases used for sample delivery. A recent observation of a diffraction pattern from an isolated GroEL protein complex Ekeberg T et al. (Light Sci Appl 13:15, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/274s41377-023-01352-7 ) had similar numbers of signal and background photons. Ongoing efforts aim to reduce the background created by sample delivery, with one approach replacing most of the used gas with helium Yenupuri T et al. (Sci Rep 14:4401, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54605-9 ). In this study, we investigate the effects of a reduced background on the resolution limits for SPI of isolated proteins under different experiment conditions. As a test case, we used GroEL, and we used experimentally derived parameters for our simulations. We observe that background significantly impacts the achievable resolution, particularly when the signal strength is comparable to the background. This is best exemplified at 6.0 keV, where a background reduction by a factor of 10 leads to a resolution improvement from 1.9 to 1.2 nm, for a dataset of [Formula: see text] patterns.

Identifiers

PMID40796631
PMCPMC12343978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.