ArticleScientific reports2025
Using failure mode and effects analysis for risk management of anesthetic and class I psychotropic drugs in inpatient pharmacy: a pilot study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In China, anesthetic drugs and class I psychotropic drugs are among the most stringently managed special medications within medical institutions. In this study, we aimed to use Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) to conduct a proactive risk assessment of management models for these drugs, addressing their unique management requirements. We established a multidisciplinary team and identified five main stages of the process. Each stage was divided into micro-activities to identify potential failure modes and their possible consequences. A risk priority number for each failure mode was calculated. The management of anesthetic drugs and class I psychotropic drugs in inpatient pharmacy revealed 15 types of failure modes, with Risk Priority Numbers (RPN) ranging from 4.21 to 38.09. The very high-/high-priority errors identified included two key categories with specific quantitative risks: (1) Patients' inability to receive medications in a timely manner (2) Discrepancies between empty ampule collection and dispensing quantities. The latter category posed significant management risks, as evidenced by RPN values exceeding 30, which indicated a high likelihood of regulatory non-compliance and increased circulation vulnerabilities. FMEA proved effective in identifying key vulnerabilities in the management of anesthetic and Class I psychotropic drugs. These findings can guide the development of a targeted information management system that will leverage modern digital tools to improve drug compliance and patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.