Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40796624›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2025

Effectiveness of cooling strategies for emergency personnel: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jorge Gutiérrez-Arroyo, Jose A Rodríguez-Marroyo, Fabio García-Heras, Juan Rodríguez-Medina, Gerardo Villa-Vicente, Belén Carballo-Leyenda

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jorge Gutiérrez-ArroyoVALFIS Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), Universidad de León, Leon, Spain.
Jose A Rodríguez-MarroyoVALFIS Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), Universidad de León, Leon, Spain. j.marroyo@unileon.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9157-1532
Fabio García-HerasVALFIS Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), Universidad de León, Leon, Spain.
Juan Rodríguez-MedinaVALFIS Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), Universidad de León, Leon, Spain.
Gerardo Villa-VicenteVALFIS Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), Universidad de León, Leon, Spain.
Belén Carballo-LeyendaVALFIS Research Group, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), Universidad de León, Leon, Spain. abcarl@unileon.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2881-5645

Funding

Consejería de Industria, Comercio y Empleo, Junta de Castilla y León (Spain) IN-VESTUN/22/LE/0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergency personnel operating in high-temperature environments while wearing protective equipment experience substantial thermophysiological strain, impairing performance and increasing the risk of heat-related illnesses. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of cooling interventions on core temperature, skin temperature, heart rate, sweat rate and tolerance time in emergency personnel exposed to heat stress. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed-MEDLINE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases up to March 2024. Controlled experimental studies published in English or Spanish were included if they assessed cooling interventions (pre-, per-, intermittent, or post-cooling; internal vs. external methods) in participants wearing protective clothing in heat stress conditions (> 28 °C), and included a non-cooling control group. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. Cooling interventions significantly reduced core temperature (ES = - 0.56, p < 0.001), heart rate (ES = - 0.42, p = 0.001), and sweat rate (ES = - 0.70, p < 0.001), while improving tolerance time (ES = 1.44, p = 0.003). Intermittent and per-cooling approaches, particularly those employing mixed-method strategies (e.g., cooling vests with immersion or ice slurry ingestion), yielded the greatest benefits. No significant changes were observed in skin temperature. Cooling interventions effectively mitigate physiological strain in emergency personnel exposed to heat stress. Intermittent and per-cooling using combined methods appear most effective. Nonetheless, logistical constraints may limit field implementation, highlighting the need for further research to optimize practical cooling protocols.

Indexed as

Heat Stress DisordersBody TemperatureHeart RateHot TemperatureHumansProtective ClothingSkin TemperatureCore temperatureHeart rateHeat stressOccupational healthProtective clothingThermophysiological strain

Identifiers

PMID40796624
PMCPMC12343767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.