Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40796617›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Network analysis of the food-energy-water nexus in the Gulf of Mexico (America) region.

Casey L Steadman, Shaun Williams, Andrew Eiswerth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Casey L SteadmanCNA Institute for Public Research, 3003 Washington Blvd, Arlington, VA, 22201, USA. steadmanc@cna.org.
Shaun WilliamsCNA Institute for Public Research, 3003 Washington Blvd, Arlington, VA, 22201, USA.
Andrew EiswerthCNA Institute for Public Research, 3003 Washington Blvd, Arlington, VA, 22201, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing stress on and dependencies among the food, energy, and water sectors make historic approaches to managing resources from a single-sector perspective unsustainable. Although significant advances have been made in understanding food-energy-water (FEW) nexus dynamics, particularly at the global scale, approaches to regional analysis are needed that provide contextual detail, identify key actors, and help inform selection of the most appropriate strategies for building resilience. Moreover, because negative feedback loops among FEW sectors occur at multiple geographic scales (local, regional, national, global), conveying a holistic picture of FEW nexus concerns and opportunities is challenging. We propose an approach to scan grey literature (e.g., news media) and distill this information into useful insights on regionally important FEW nexus feedback loops and quantitative data for constructing geospatially anchored social networks. Furthermore, we showcase how integrating and embedding this qualitative and quantitative data into an ArcGIS StoryMap allows for interactive and layered communication of FEW tension points, regional hotspots, and key players, facilitating the ability for stakeholders to obtain and build a multi-scale, holistic perspective of FEW nexus dynamics. As a demonstration of this approach, we use the Gulf of Mexico (America) region, which provides critical services in the food and energy sectors amidst dwindling, quality water resources.

Indexed as

Food-Energy-Water nexusGulf of AmericaGulf of MexicoNetwork analysisResilience

Identifiers

PMID40796617
PMCPMC12343756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.