ArticleScientific reports2025
Adjusted imbalance ratio leads to effective AI-based drug discovery against infectious disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing artificial intelligence for antimicrobial discovery and optimization.Current opinion in microbiology · 2026Review
- Bridging predictive reliability and explainability: a multi-representation deep learning framework for chemical space analysis of immune bioassays.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- Tranylcypromine: a promising repurposed drug against Leishmaniases.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The success of AI-based pipelines in Drug Discovery (DD) heavily depends on three components: the dataset (size, content, imbalance ratio), the encoding system and the predictive model. This study focuses on optimizing these elements to develop robust predictive models for the biological activity of chemical molecules. We trained five machine learning and six deep learning algorithms to predict the anti-pathogen activity of chemical compounds, derived from PubChem Bioassays targeting four infectious diseases. The datasets exhibited a significant imbalance towards the inactive class. To address this, we implemented a K-ratio random undersampling approach (K-RUS) to determine optimal imbalance ratios (IRs), and compared them to conventional resampling approaches. Across all simulations, a moderate IR (1:10) significantly enhanced models' performance. Through external validation, we assessed the generalization power of the top-performing models and observed optimal balance between true positive and false positive rates with the 10-RUS configuration. Furthermore, we investigated the chemical similarity between active and inactive classes, which revealed the underlying mechanisms of misclassification. Our findings emphasized the need for optimizing imbalance ratios and leveraging chemical diversity to improve AI-driven DD against infectious diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.