ArticleScientific reports2025
Advanced food waste quantification at municipal level to strengthen the assessment of prevention actions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Food loss and waste (FLW) demands urgent attention: over 58 million tonnes wasted annually in the EU, while 828 million people face hunger worldwide. SDG 12.3 targets a 50% reduction in FLW by 2030, requiring rigorous quantification. Governments must quantify FLW, especially at the consumption stage, where most of FLW is generated. However, the limited granularity of existing data emphasises the need for improved quantification methods that enable reliable comparisons and set solid basis to measure the impact of future FLW prevention actions. This paper proposes a FLW quantification methodology at municipal and regional scales aligned with the existing urban waste management requirements. The methodology involved experts and stakeholders to define the optimal FLW quantification framework and measurement method. It was validated in 6 Basque municipalities with a common waste characterisation matrix to compare waste fractions, generator types and waste collection systems. A cartographic analysis, from regional to street level, demonstrates how data granularity shapes FLW pattern interpretation. As in the case of Zamudio, where data at container level permits detailed insights. This approach enables improved waste collection and the design of ad-hoc FLW prevention actions (like economic instruments) according to the generator profile and type of FLW.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.