ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-strategy collaborative optimization of gravitational search algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving women football tactics analysis by using extreme learning and accumulated optimization algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the shortcomings of the gravitational search algorithm, such as its tendency to fall into local optima, slow convergence, and low solution accuracy, this paper proposes a gravitational search algorithm based on multi-strategy cooperative optimization. The proposed algorithm balances global exploration and local exploitation. In the early iterations, particle positions are primarily updated using the original gravitational force, preserving the inherent characteristics of the gravitational search algorithm. In the later stages, particles with better fitness values are updated using a globally optimal Lévy random walk strategy to enhance local search capabilities, while particles with poorer fitness values are updated using the sparrow algorithm follower strategy. This approach increases the exploration of the particles in unexplored local areas, further improving the local exploitation abilities of the algorithm. Finally, the lens-imaging opposition-based learning strategy generates opposite solutions for particles at different stages, increasing population diversity, expanding the search range, and enhancing the global search performance of the algorithm. An effectiveness analysis and algorithm comparison tests were carried out on 24 typical complex benchmark functions. The performance analysis results show that the multi-strategy collaborative optimization method effectively leverages both the global and local search abilities of the algorithm, improving the accuracy of its solutions and stability. Compared with other GSA-based algorithms and advanced intelligent algorithms, the proposed algorithm exhibits superior solution accuracy, convergence speed, and stability, making it an efficient GSA-based algorithm. In addition, the proposed algorithm was applied to three engineering design optimization problems to verify its applicability to real-world scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.