ArticleNature communications2025
REST/NRSF Preserves muscle stem cell identity by repressing alternate cell fate.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- TGFβ1-loaded extracellular matrix hydrogels promote skeletal muscle stem cell regeneration via m6A-mediated integrin-ERK signaling.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Immune signaling as a determinant of cellular identity and tissue function.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Alternative Splicing: Molecular Mechanisms, Biological Functions, Diseases, and Potential Therapeutic Targets.MedComm · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell fate and identity require timely activation of lineage-specific and concomitant repression of alternate-lineage genes. How this process is epigenetically encoded remains largely unknown. In skeletal muscle stem cells, the myogenic regulatory factors are well-established drivers of muscle gene activation but less is known about how non-muscle gene repression is achieved. Here, we show that the master epigenetic regulator, Repressor Element 1-Silencing Transcription factor (REST), also known as Neuron-Restrictive Silencer Factor (NRSF), is a key regulator of this process. We show that many non-lineage genes retain permissive chromatin state but are actively repressed by REST. Loss of functional REST in muscle stem cells and progenitors disrupts muscle specific epigenetic and transcriptional signatures, impairs differentiation, and triggers apoptosis in progenitor cells, leading to depletion of the stem cell pool. Consequently, REST-deficient skeletal muscle exhibits impaired regeneration and reduced myofiber growth postnatally. Collectively, our data suggests that REST plays a key role in safeguarding muscle stem cell identity by repressing multiple non-muscle lineage and developmentally regulated genes in adult mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.