Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40796547›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Skillful subseasonal soil moisture drought forecasts with deep learning-dynamic models.

Kyle Lesinger, Di Tian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kyle LesingerDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0180-4353
Di TianDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA. tiandi@auburn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7752-947X

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) NSF-DGE-1922687National Science Foundation (NSF) NSF-EAR-2144293United States Department of Agriculture | National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Accession No. 7006495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep neural networks that learn from climate reanalysis data have produced skillful weather forecasts within ten days. However, it is still a great challenge for dynamic models to predict soil moisture, droughts, and other extreme events with lead times beyond two weeks. Here, we combine a recursive deep learning model (namely RISE-UNet) and subseasonal forecasts from dynamic models and achieve skillful forecasts of root zone soil moisture up to four weeks in advance. Our hybrid model, combining RISE-UNet and dynamic model forecasts, outperforms reanalysis-driven RISE-UNet models, while both methods show significantly higher performance than the latest European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS) dynamic models, the postprocessed ECMWF or GEFS subseasonal forecasts by RISE-UNet, or ensemble model output statistics. The hybrid model shows skill in predicting flash droughts, which is higher than ECMWF and GEFS models in most cases, as demonstrated for major events in the United States, China, and Australia. The forecast skill of the hybrid modeling approach from weeks three to four is mainly due to the inclusion of the first two-week dynamic model forecasts and antecedent root zone soil moisture reanalysis. Our results indicate that combining deep learning with dynamic model forecasts can substantially improve the skill of subseasonal predictions beyond two weeks, particularly for root zone soil moisture and flash drought events.

Identifiers

PMID40796547
PMCPMC12343872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.