ArticleJournal of clinical pharmacology2025
Exposure-Response Modeling and Simulation to Identify Optimal Mavacamten Posology When Coadministered with CYP3A4 and CYP2C19 Inhibitors in Patients with Obstructive HCM.
Article in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mavacamten, a cardiac myosin inhibitor, is primarily metabolized by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes CYP2C19 and CYP3A4, and coadministration with strong CYP3A4 or CYP2C19 inhibitors was contraindicated in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) in the US Prescribing Information. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of modifying mavacamten posology to accommodate coadministration with strong CYP3A4 and strong/moderate CYP2C19 inhibitors. Simulations of 5000 virtual patients with obstructive HCM with an equal distribution of CYP2C19 metabolizer phenotypes were performed using population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response modeling approaches. A reference posology and variations thereof were simulated to evaluate long-term (chronic) and short-term (1-week) coadministration with CYP3A4 or CYP2C19 inhibitors. Proportions of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% and Valsalva left ventricular outflow tract gradient (VLVOTg) <30 mm Hg were evaluated to assess safety and efficacy, respectively. Compared with the reference posology, a modified posology, which used a 2.5-mg starting dose with coadministration being stopped if LVEF was <50% at any time when receiving 2.5 mg, resulted in a similar peak proportion of CYP2C19 poor metabolizers and CYP2C19 ultrarapid metabolizers with LVEF <50% when initiating mavacamten with a CYP3A4 or CYP2C19 inhibitor, respectively. Achievement of optimal efficacy was delayed in some patients owing to dose reduction. Initiation of CYP3A4 or CYP2C19 inhibitor treatment in patients receiving stable mavacamten therapy was accommodated through mavacamten dose reduction by one level. Interruption of mavacamten during short-term administration of inhibitors transiently increased VLVOTg for the duration of interruption, with no effect on LVEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.