Trial reportJournal of the National Cancer Institute2025
Predicting ovarian function loss after chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy in young breast cancer patients.
Trial report in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter Phase III Randomized Trial of Adjuvant Therapy for Patients With HER2-Positive Node-Positive or High Risk Node-Negative Breast Cancer Comparing Chemotherapy Plus Trastuzumab With Chemotherapy Plus Trastuzumab Plus Bevacizumab
A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label, Phase III Trial Comparing Trastuzumab Plus Pertuzumab Plus a Taxane Following Anthracyclines Versus Trastuzumab Emtansine Plus Pertuzumab Following Anthracyclines as Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Operable HER2-Positive Primary Breast Cancer
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breast Cancer and Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation: SWOT Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Estradiol levels in women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer on fulvestrant therapy.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Surgical Ovarian Suppression and Breast Cancer-What Do We Know About It?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe ability to predict ovarian function loss after anticancer treatment is important for appropriate oncofertility counseling and to aid in therapy decision-making for young women with early breast cancer (eBC).
methodsThis biomarker analysis of the BETH (NCT00625898) and KAITLIN (NCT01966471) randomized trials investigated anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) use, alone and combined with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol (E2), for predicting ovarian function loss following currently adopted chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy in premenopausal women with HER2-positive eBC. Serum samples were centrally tested measuring AMH, FSH, and E2 using Roche Elecsys assays.
resultsAmong 194 included patients (BETH: n = 62; KAITLIN: n = 132), AMH values declined from baseline median 8.44 pmol L-1 to undetectable levels (<0.07 pmol L-1) at the end of therapy, with partial recovery at 36 months (median 0.14 pmol L-1). AMH measured at baseline was predictive of ovarian loss (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.784). Addition of age to AMH slightly improved AUC to 0.800. AMH measured at the end of therapy had AUC 0.741, which increased to 0.785 with addition of age. The combination of AMH at baseline and end of therapy increased prediction to 0.808 and with addition of age to 0.820. Addition of baseline FSH and E2 did not improve prediction in any analysis.
conclusionsThese results support the use of pretreatment measurement of AMH in predicting ovarian function loss in premenopausal women with HER2-positive eBC receiving chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy. Measurement of AMH at the end of treatment had reduced accuracy than pretreatment but in combination added slightly to the value of pretreatment sampling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.