SynthesisHealth education research2025
Facilitators and barriers to smoking cessation support among professionals in social and community service settings: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.
Synthesis in Health education research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Provider Perspectives on a Tobacco-Free Workplace Program in Healthcare Settings Serving Rural and Medically Underserved Areas of Texas: A Mixed Methods Study on Perceived Resource Availability and Value.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- From Attitude to Action: Identifying the Knowledge and Practice Gap in Smoke-free Home Promotion Among Texas Community Health Workers and Health Education Specialists.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Social and community service settings are a promising environment to support individuals with lower socioeconomic positions in quitting smoking. However, there remains a notable lack of support from their professionals in these settings. This study provides an overview of facilitators and barriers to smoking cessation support among these professionals. A systematic review was conducted up to April 2024 using five databases. Data were analysed using thematic synthesis, with themes categorized according to the Social Ecological Model. Eleven studies were included. We found twelve factors that could facilitate professionals in providing support. These factors related to the intrapersonal (i.e. knowledge/skills, self-efficacy, and belief), interpersonal (i.e. trustworthy connection with clients, readiness of clients, and clients' supportive social environment), organizational (i.e. expertise improvement in smoking cessation, availability of resources, and organizational support), and societal level (i.e. availability of appropriate cessation programmes, supportive healthcare financing, and public awareness). We found that these factors often were not present, which hindered professionals from providing support. Professionals working in social and community service settings could reach many people who smoke. However, there are numerous obstacles to overcome before their full potential can be realized. To harness this potential, organizational changes are necessary, with governments playing a supportive role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.