Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40796316›Full record

SynthesisDento maxillo facial radiology2025

The performance of large language models in dentomaxillofacial radiology: a systematic review.

Zekai Liu, Andrew Nalley, Jing Hao, Qi Yong H Ai, Andy Wai Kan Yeung, Ray Tanaka, Kuo Feng Hung

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zekai LiuOral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Division of Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, China.
Andrew NalleyOral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Division of Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, China.
Jing HaoOral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Division of Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, China.
Qi Yong H AiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1155-4389
Andy Wai Kan YeungOral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Division of Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3672-357X
Ray TanakaOral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Division of Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3889-5164
Kuo Feng HungOral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Division of Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3971-3484

Funding

HKU URC Seed Fund for Basic Research for New Staff and Matching Fund 103036002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to systematically review the current performance of large language models (LLMs) in dento-maxillofacial radiology (DMFR).

methodsFive electronic databases were used to identify studies that developed, fine-tuned, or evaluated LLMs for DMFR-related tasks. Data extracted included study purpose, LLM type, images/text source, applied language, dataset characteristics, input and output, performance outcomes, evaluation methods, and reference standards. Customized assessment criteria adapted from the TRIPOD-LLM reporting guideline were used to evaluate the risk-of-bias in the included studies specifically regarding the clarity of dataset origin, the robustness of performance evaluation methods, and the validity of the reference standards.

resultsThe initial search yielded 1621 titles, and 19 studies were included. These studies investigated the use of LLMs for tasks including the production and answering of DMFR-related qualification exams and educational questions (n = 8), diagnosis and treatment recommendations (n = 7), and radiology report generation and patient communication (n = 4). LLMs demonstrated varied performance in diagnosing dental conditions, with accuracy ranging from 37% to 92.5% and expert ratings for differential diagnosis and treatment planning between 3.6 and 4.7 on a 5-point scale. For DMFR-related qualification exams and board-style questions, LLMs achieved correctness rates between 33.3% and 86.1%. Automated radiology report generation showed moderate performance with accuracy ranging from 70.4% to 81.3%.

conclusionsLLMs demonstrate promising potential in DMFR, particularly for diagnostic, educational, and report generation tasks. However, their current accuracy, completeness, and consistency remain variable. Further development, validation, and standardization are needed before LLMs can be reliably integrated as supportive tools in clinical workflows and educational settings.

Indexed as

LanguageRadiography, DentalHumansLarge Language Modelschatbotsdento-maxillofacial radiologygenerative artificial intelligencelarge language models

Identifiers

PMID40796316
PMCPMC12653761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.