SynthesisDento maxillo facial radiology2025
The performance of large language models in dentomaxillofacial radiology: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Current evidence of generative artificial intelligence specifically developed for dental and maxillofacial radiology: a systematic review.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluation of artificial intelligence-based software programs applied to the radiographic and photographic identification of dental implant systems.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2026Article
- Performance of generative artificial intelligence in oral and maxillofacial radiology based on the board-certification examination of Japan.Oral radiology · 2026Article
- Can vision-language models estimate patient age? evidence from panoramic radiographs.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Review
- Commercial large language models for oral cavity cancer staging using descriptive pre-treatment MRI reports: ready for standalone use in clinical practice?Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Comparison of Multimodal Large Language Models and Oral and Maxillofacial Radiologists in the Detection of Incidental Findings on Panoramic Radiographs: A CBCT-Referenced Diagnostic Accuracy Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Associations Between Systemic Diseases and Dental Pulp Diagnoses: A Retrospective Chart Study Using a Locally Deployed Large Language Model.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Reproducibility of Mandibular Cortical Index Classification Among Dental Examiners and a Single Generative AI Platform: An Observer Agreement Study.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reporting Jaw Lesions on Panoramic Radiographs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- JADE: jawbone lesion diagnosis and decision supporting system.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2026Article
- Zero-shot detection of apical periodontitis on periapical radiographs using multimodal large language models: diagnostic accuracy and error patterns.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Impact of Generative AI-Enhanced Low-Dose Cone-Beam Computed Tomography on Diagnosis and Treatment Planning for Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Multimodal large language models for oral lesion diagnosis: a systematic review of diagnostic performance and clinical utility.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
- Performance of a Vision-Language Model in Detecting Common Dental Conditions on Panoramic Radiographs Using Different Tooth Numbering Systems.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to systematically review the current performance of large language models (LLMs) in dento-maxillofacial radiology (DMFR).
methodsFive electronic databases were used to identify studies that developed, fine-tuned, or evaluated LLMs for DMFR-related tasks. Data extracted included study purpose, LLM type, images/text source, applied language, dataset characteristics, input and output, performance outcomes, evaluation methods, and reference standards. Customized assessment criteria adapted from the TRIPOD-LLM reporting guideline were used to evaluate the risk-of-bias in the included studies specifically regarding the clarity of dataset origin, the robustness of performance evaluation methods, and the validity of the reference standards.
resultsThe initial search yielded 1621 titles, and 19 studies were included. These studies investigated the use of LLMs for tasks including the production and answering of DMFR-related qualification exams and educational questions (n = 8), diagnosis and treatment recommendations (n = 7), and radiology report generation and patient communication (n = 4). LLMs demonstrated varied performance in diagnosing dental conditions, with accuracy ranging from 37% to 92.5% and expert ratings for differential diagnosis and treatment planning between 3.6 and 4.7 on a 5-point scale. For DMFR-related qualification exams and board-style questions, LLMs achieved correctness rates between 33.3% and 86.1%. Automated radiology report generation showed moderate performance with accuracy ranging from 70.4% to 81.3%.
conclusionsLLMs demonstrate promising potential in DMFR, particularly for diagnostic, educational, and report generation tasks. However, their current accuracy, completeness, and consistency remain variable. Further development, validation, and standardization are needed before LLMs can be reliably integrated as supportive tools in clinical workflows and educational settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.