ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2025
A Confidence-Based Multibody Kinematics Optimization for Markerless Motion Capture: A Proof of Concept.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Confidence-Based Multibody Kinematics Optimization for Markerless Motion Capture: A Proof of Concept.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multi-camera markerless motion capture commonly triangulates 3D points from 2D keypoint positions in multiple camera views, then applies a multibody kinematics optimization (MKO) to incorporate biomechanical constraints. However, standard pipelines neglect the 2D confidence heatmaps generated by human pose estimation networks. We hypothesized that performing MKO in 2D camera planes would make it more robust to missing keypoints and allow us to obtain better accuracy. 2D confidence heatmaps were used to maximize available information. To test this, we first model each network-derived heatmap as a 2D Gaussian function characterized by its center, amplitude, and standard deviation. Second, we maximize the sum of these modeled confidences after projecting the biomechanical model into the camera planes. To demonstrate feasibility, we evaluated our method on data from two participants performing sit-to-stand, walking, and manual material handling, captured by a two-camera setup, and simultaneously collected marker-based data. Our Gaussian modeling of the heatmaps demonstrated a mean absolute difference of 0.011 compared to the original discrete maps, confirming its validity. In terms of 3D joint positions and angles, the confidence-based MKO produced results similar to classical distance-based methods. Notably, the confidence-based approach overcame occultations: 89.3% of frames could only be obtained with the distance-based MKO due to missing keypoints, while the confidence-based MKO computed 100% of frames. These findings underscore the potential of using full 2D confidence heatmaps in markerless motion capture, especially under challenging conditions such as sparse camera setups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.