Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40796220›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2025

Patient perception of physician attire: a systematic review update.

Janghyeon Kim, Yan Ba, Jee-Young Kim, Bo-Young Youn

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Patient Preferences of Interventional Radiologists' Appearance and Attire.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janghyeon KimHwasung Medi-Science University, Hwaseong-si, Korea (the Republic of).
Yan BaFashion Institute, Dalian Art College, Dalian, Liaoning, China.
Jee-Young KimMedical R&D Center, Bodyfriend, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of).
Bo-Young YounHwasung Medi-Science University, Hwaseong-si, Korea (the Republic of) jmyoun07@daum.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5228-6627

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis systematic review aims to update and analyse patient perceptions of physician attire, focusing on its impact on the physician-patient relationship across different medical settings and specialties.

designA systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses criteria. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar were searched for relevant studies from 1 January 2015 to 1 June 2025. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: This review examined studies focused on physician attire and its impact on patient perceptions. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Studies were assessed based on authors, study setting, study design, objective, study population, physician specialty, measures, findings, main conclusion and risk of bias. Then, thematic analysis was employed to synthesise the findings of the articles.

results28 studies met the inclusion criteria. Patient preferences for physician attire varied significantly by clinical context, medical specialty and physician gender. In outpatient and primary care settings, mixed evidence was reported, with some studies suggesting that a combination of casual attire and white coats may foster approachability and communication, while others showed no clear preference. In contrast, in high-acuity settings such as emergency rooms and operating theatres, scrubs were consistently favoured, indicating moderate to strong evidence for the association with professionalism and preparedness. During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients expressed stronger preferences for scrubs and PPE, emphasising infection prevention and hygiene. Gender-specific findings indicated that male physicians were perceived as more professional when wearing formal attire with white coats, while female physicians in similar attire were often misidentified as nurses or assistants. Specialty-based differences were also observed, with preferences for white coats in dermatology, neurosurgery and ophthalmology, while scrubs were preferred in anaesthesiology and gastroenterology.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that physician attire consistently and significantly impacts patients' perceptions of professionalism, trust and communication. The collective findings provide robust evidence that these perceptions are highly context-dependent, necessitating adaptable dress codes tailored to clinical environments and patient expectations to enhance trust and patient satisfaction.

trial registrationhttps://osf.io/kjr4p.

Indexed as

ClothingPatient PreferencePhysician-Patient RelationsPhysiciansCOVID-19HumansPatient PreferencePhysiciansSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID40796220
PMCPMC12352141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.