ArticleThe oncologist2025
Treatment, outcomes, and resource utilization among patients with metastatic breast and advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, by BRCA1/2 and HRD status.
Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitors in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: biological determinants and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPoly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) are indicated for treatment of tumors with breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1/2 mutations and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Little is known about differences in care by BRCA1/2 and HRD status for breast and ovarian cancers.
methodsWe investigated clinical characteristics, treatment, clinical outcomes, and health-care resource utilization by BRCA1/2 or HRD status among patients diagnosed between 2018-2020 with HER2-negative metastatic breast (mBC) and advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (aEOC) in the United States community healthcare setting.
resultsThe study included 314 patients with mBC and 465 with aEOC. Patients with mBC carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation were younger and had a higher proportion of triple negative cancer than non-carriers (50% vs 38%). Only 8% of eligible patients received a PARPi in first-line (1L) and 18% in second-line (2L) of treatment for mBC. In aEOC, patients with HRD were younger and a higher proportion received 1L maintenance treatment with a PARPi than patients with non-HRD tumors (95% vs 66%). In aEOC, patients without HRD had greater healthcare resource use. Patients with BRCA-mutated tumors had poorer overall survival (OS); there were no differences in OS by HRD status in aEOC.
conclusionThis study demonstrated differences in treatment by BRCA1/2 and HRD status. There was low PARPi uptake among patients with BRCA-mutated mBC but not among patients with aEOC. In aEOC, the cost to "treat all" may outweigh benefits; identifying patients without HRD likely to benefit from PARPis is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.