ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2025
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Open-Angle Glaucoma in an Adult Chinese American Population: The Chinese American Eye Study.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo estimate the prevalence of and identify risk factors associated with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) among adult Chinese Americans.
designPopulation-based, cross-sectional study.
participantsA total of 4582 Chinese Americans aged 50 years and older residing in Monterey Park, California.
methodsParticipants from the Chinese American Eye Study underwent a comprehensive interview, eye examination, and ophthalmic testing. OAG was defined by characteristic optic nerve head changes with or without corresponding visual field loss, as determined by a panel of glaucoma specialists, and required at gonioscopic confirmation of least 2 quadrants of visible pigmented trabecular meshwork. Candidate risk factors comprised demographic, clinical, and ocular characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors associated with OAG.
main outcome measuresPrevalence of and independent risk factors associated with OAG.
resultsOf the 4310 participants with complete data, the prevalence of OAG was 4.8% (207/4310), ranging from 2.8% among those aged 50 to 59 years to 14.8% among those 80 years and older. Of those with OAG, 68.5% were previously undiagnosed or untreated, and 88.5% had intraocular pressure (IOP) ≤21 mm Hg. Independent risk factors for OAG, adjusting for sex, were older age (odds ratio [confidence interval] = 1.06 [1.05-1.08], per year); higher IOP (1.12 [1.08-1.17], per mm Hg); longer axial length (1.36 [1.25-1.47], per mm); family history of glaucoma (1.88 [1.19-2.97]); and diabetes mellitus (1.49 [1.05-2.11]).
conclusionsThe prevalence of OAG among Chinese Americans may be higher than that reported in US populations of European descent and in Asia-based Chinese populations, but lower than that observed in Latinos in Los Angeles and individuals of African Caribbean descent. More than two-thirds of OAG cases in our study were previously undiagnosed or untreated, with a majority presenting with IOP ≤21 mm Hg. These findings highlight the importance of identifying high-risk individuals based on age, IOP, axial length, family history, and diabetes mellitus. Given the high prevalence of myopia, future research should evaluate whether interventions to prevent myopia could help reduce the risk for developing OAG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.