ArticleJournal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction2025
Excessive gestational weight gain associated with higher risk of cesarean delivery across body mass index categories in the United States.
Article in Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis research investigated associations between rate of gestational weight gain (GWG; "below recommended rate," "within recommended rate," and "exceeding recommended rate") and increased risk of cesarean delivery for women across a range of body mass index (BMI) categories (underweight, normal, overweight, obesity classes I, II, and III). STUDY
designWe used vital records data from the National Center for Health Statistics to include nulliparous, singleton term births with cephalic presentation (n=7,891,653) to women who gave birth in the United States from 2014 through 2022. We evaluated the association of GWG on mode of birth (cesarean vs. vaginal delivery) using multivariable linear probability (categorical GWG) and generalized additive (continuous GWG) models.
resultsApproximately 26% of births were by cesarean delivery and 65% exceeded the recommended rate of GWG. Risk of cesarean delivery increased as BMI increased, and those in pre-pregnancy BMI above normal categories had higher risk of cesarean delivery. Excessive GWG (EGWG) increased the risk of cesarean delivery for all women, but the effect was more pronounced in those with a higher pre-pregnancy BMI. Among women whose BMI was underweight or normal, GWG had a J-shaped relationship with cesarean delivery risk, while women whose pre-pregnancy BMI was categorized as overweight or obese demonstrated a relatively linear increase in risk with any GWG.
conclusionsFindings provide valuable insights on EGWG and increased risk of cesarean delivery for women across BMI categories. Additional efforts are needed at both the patient and provider level to reduce EGWG and the risk of cesarean delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.