ArticleBiology letters2025
Late Pleistocene faunal community patterns disrupted by Holocene human impacts.
Article in Biology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Late Pleistocene faunal community patterns disrupted by Holocene human impacts.Biology letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We analysed fossil mammal assemblages from over 350 Late Pleistocene and Holocene sites worldwide to test whether human activities, such as agriculture, domestication and intensified land use, restructured global patterns of mammal co-occurrence. Using presence-absence data, we contrasted a novel iterative 'chase clustering' method, which is compositionally driven, against a traditional spatially constrained Ward's clustering approach. Both methods recovered continental-scale groupings in the Pleistocene, consistent with known biogeographic boundaries. Holocene land use and domestication reconfigured these historical patterns, creating novel assemblages independent of previous biogeographic constraints. Faunal turnover at the local scale varied substantially across regions, being especially pronounced in the Americas, whereas other areas showed relative stability. Even moderate expansion of domesticates altered how communities grouped, highlighting their disproportionate ecological influence. Our findings demonstrate that human-driven niche modification, beyond earlier megafaunal extinctions, profoundly reshaped mammal communities on a global scale. Recognizing these anthropogenic legacies provides essential context for anticipating how current and future human pressures might further transform biodiversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.