ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025
Can we tell where our bodies end and the external world begins? Evidence for precise three-dimensional internal body models.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Can we tell where our bodies end and the external world begins? Evidence for precise three-dimensional internal body models.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Distinguishing our body from the external world is crucial for self-perception and environmental interaction. Yet, the accuracy with which we perceive this boundary remains underexplored. Here, we developed a psychophysical protocol to assess how accurately individuals perceive their body boundaries. Participants were asked whether the midpoint between two tactile stimuli was inside or outside their perceived body boundary. Three-dimensional scans provided objective anatomical boundaries, allowing psychometric functions to be fitted. Results revealed remarkable overall precision, often within millimetres, in localizing body boundaries across multiple body regions. However, accuracy varied: while palm boundaries were localized nearly perfectly, stimuli along the wrist boundaries were frequently misjudged as extending beyond their true anatomical limit, revealing a systematic perceptual bias. Perceptual judgements adapted to changes in posture, but accuracy declined when the detailed local three-dimensional structure was omitted, indicating that proprioceptive cues are combined with detailed local body models. Finally, participants whose anatomy deviated from the average tended to align their responses with a typical body model rather than their unique physiology, suggesting that top-down processes influence boundary judgements. Our findings suggest that body boundary representation combines detailed three-dimensional body models with proprioceptive feedback into an integrated perceptual model of the anatomical body.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.